Actions

Special

Search results

Page title matches

  • [[Category: Reviews]]
    568 bytes (72 words) - 06:08, 25 August 2007

Page text matches

  • ...inning. With many still hung onto ''[[Music Has the Right to Children]]'', reviews looked down on Michael and Marcus' sophomore album as "under-produced" or n
    11 KB (1,812 words) - 18:07, 14 August 2018
  • === Reviews === * [http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/b/boards-of-canada/campfire-headphase.shtml Pitchfork review by Mark Richar
    9 KB (1,468 words) - 12:26, 17 November 2017
  • ...lso the review articles: [[Tomorrow%27s_Harvest#Reviews|Tomorrow's Harvest#Reviews]]
    29 KB (4,049 words) - 19:20, 15 August 2023
  • == Critical Reviews == ...://web.archive.org/web/20000816163145/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/b/boards-of-canada/hi-scores.shtml Pitchfork Media Review by Paul Cooper]
    3 KB (460 words) - 16:32, 5 April 2024
  • ...some sort of proud when records are bought by musicfans and get good press reviews. Or don't you?}} reviews at Forcefield:<br>
    10 KB (1,699 words) - 21:21, 7 December 2021
  • ...nal cassette tapes from Mike and Marcus Sandison. [[http://www.discogs.com/reviews/list?release=690476]]
    11 KB (1,760 words) - 01:35, 18 March 2024
  • [[Category: Reviews]]
    568 bytes (72 words) - 06:08, 25 August 2007
  • ''[[Music Has the Right to Children]]'' received rave reviews in the international music press, and after landing a licensing deal with M [[Music Has the Right to Children]] received rave reviews in the international music press, and after landing a licensing deal with M
    68 KB (11,020 words) - 20:31, 5 July 2018
  • ...tes and six seconds long. Like its predecessor, Geogaddi is garnering rave reviews from critics, showing skeptics that [[Boards of Canada|BoC]]'s early succes
    17 KB (2,850 words) - 16:24, 7 December 2021
  • ...expect to get any answers from Mike and Marcus. {{boc|We avoid reading all reviews,}} says '''Mike''' firmly, {{boc|so we don't know what the world thinks of
    6 KB (915 words) - 14:20, 8 December 2021
  • ...anticipated records of 2002. I guess this weekend saw the first string of reviews in the magazines. What's the best and the worst criticism you got so far?}} {{boc|'''Marcus''': We try not to look at reviews. It starts to affect your work if you read the comments people make. Even p
    26 KB (4,515 words) - 16:14, 7 December 2021
  • == Reviews == ...rates the album '''9/10'''. <ref>http://drownedinsound.com/releases/17683/reviews/4146493?recommended-records</ref>
    24 KB (3,200 words) - 11:12, 5 December 2023
  • {{question|The atmosphere on the new record is darker than before. A lot of reviews use the word post-apocalyptic. Do you agree with that? }}
    15 KB (2,383 words) - 12:02, 7 December 2021
  • ...auch fast genauso hinbekommen haben. Grundsätzlich interessieren uns die Reviews und der ganze Internet-Chat über unsere Musik nicht wirklich. Wir versuche ...ly as we wanted to achieve it. In principle we don't really care about the reviews and all the internet chat about our music. We always just try to follow our
    17 KB (2,758 words) - 13:56, 8 December 2021
  • ...I was baffled. I hadn't sent it out yet!}} There are also fans who make up reviews, like the one who runs the Angryrobot blog, who published a track-by-track
    44 KB (7,913 words) - 18:25, 3 December 2021